(Get Answer) – You have been meeting with the ceo, the project sponsor, your Type: Individual ProjectUnit: Defining and Identifying RiskDue Date: Wed, 4/29/16Grading Type: NumericDeliverable Length: 2-4 pages & a spreadsheet with risks listed For the Unit 1 assignments use the following scenario. Review the scenario first and then continue on with your assignment. Consider saving the PDF or printing it out for your reference.You have been meeting with the CEO, the project sponsor, your manager, and the heads of all the other departments to discuss the project and their expectations. You are starting to be concerned about the level of risk of this project and whether or not the organization really understands it. As far as you can tell, the company has never done formal risk management, taking a more relaxed approach to risks. You are starting to develop your risk management plan; you will present it to your manager and the sponsor in two weeks along with some other project planning deliverables.Assignment Guidelines:Create a project charter and identify the key constraints of the project (scope, budget, timeline, quality, people resources, etc.).Using the scenario from this unit, create a spreadsheet that lists all the project risks you see based on what you currently know about the project. List at least 15 risks. For each project risk, provide a:Detailed descriptionCategory (schedule, strategy, people, etc.)Note: This list will be used in later activities throughout the course.Your submitted assignment (140 points) must include the following:A 2–4 page typed document that includes:A project charter and identification of key constraintsAt least 15 risks listed in a spreadsheet with a detailed description and the category of each · Assignment Objectives· Compose risk assessments, and discuss techniques for monitoring and controlling risks· Create and present a risk management plan· Understand the techniques for identifying and mitigating against project risks Individual Project Rubric Grading CriteriaPercentageDeliverable requirements addressed; understanding of material and writer’s message and intent are clear.35%Scholarly research supports the writer’s position and is properly acknowledged, and cited direct quotations may not exceed 10% of the word count of the body of the assignment deliverable (excluding title page, abstract, table of contents, tables, exhibits, appendices, and reference pages). Inclusion of plagiarized content will not be tolerated and may result in adverse academic consequences.20%Critical thinking: Position is well-justified, there is logical flow, and there are examples.20%Structure: Includes introduction and conclusion, proper paragraph format, and reads as a polished, academic paper or professional presentation, as appropriate for the required assignment deliverable.10%Mechanical: No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.10%APA: Deliverable is cited properly according to the APA Publication Manual (6th ed.).5%